Every day, we men (primarily of non-color), with an intact sack and brain, invariably question, reading the latest news: Is this satire?
Sadly, in most instances, the most insane materials are not satire, and the wildest undocumented and unfounded claims are now deemed to be factual, including vikings being in fact female warriors, Brits being black, and constant non-sense such as genders being a social construct, or SJW’s deserving Veteran status.
Overall, the regressive liberal left has completely abandoned science, something to expect when female and feminized brains are known to operate on emotions in contrast to the more analytic male brains, for the sole purpose of accommodating their utterly and absolutely mad agenda and narrative.
Here are some of the best example of peer-reviewed insanity.
This peer-reviewed social research paper argues, in a nutshell, that penises are not biological and are instead social constructs. It was published by Cogent Social Sciences, reviewed by various “experts” including Jamie Halsall of University of Huddersfield (United Kingdom of course),
This 3,000-word excerpt of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf, rewritten using terms related to Intersectionality theory, was accepted and published by The Gender Studies journal Affilia. Similarities are striking:
In paper: “Feminism cannot limit itself to half-measures in solidarity, only a single-minded alignment with solidarity for effecting the goal of justice will suffice.”
Hitler’s original: “The nationalization of the broad masses can never be achieved by half-measures, but only by a ruthless and fanatically one-sided orientation toward the goal to be achieved.”
The editors of Affilia actually praised the paper’s “potential to generate important dialogue for social workers and feminist scholars.”
This science gem was published in Gender, Place and Culture. Academic Helen Wilson contends that during her 2-year study of dog parks, she witnessed a dog rape every hour or so. She argues that dog parks are “oppressive spaces that lock both humans and animals into hegemonic patterns of gender conformity that effectively resist bids for emancipatory change.” Wilson also writes that “dog parks are petri dishes for canine rape culture.” Helen Wilson goes as far as stating she physically checked the genitals of roughly 10,000 dogs to ensure the culprits were, in fact, males.
Editor and peers at Gender, Place and Culture described the work as “an important contribution to feminist animal geography.”
The paper was also embraced and worshipped by universities in the “free” world, including but not limited to UCLA, Temple, Pen State, and TCD.
This scientific research study published in Sexuality and Culture, peer-reviewed of course, advocates “exposure therapy” for all heterosexual men, namely frequent anal penetration with dildos. The researchers argue that this would ensure men become better attuned to issues of social justice, including “potentially greater awareness about rape.” A practical section in the paper clarifies that men can insert the dildos themselves, or have their partner do it with a strap-on.
More outstanding scientific research includes a peer-reviewed paper that argues male masturbation is sexual violence against the object of the man’s lust, namely:
This article seeks to situate non-consensual male autoerotic fantasizing about women as a form of metasexual violence that depersonalizes her, injures her being on an affective level, contributes to consequent harms of objectification and rape culture, and can appropriate her identity for the purpose of male sexual gratification.
Another gem, published in Fat Studies, peer-reviewed of course as with all other papers, filled with a never ending list of references, and even the subject of great praises from the academic community, argues that getting fat, as in fat building, should not only be socially accepted, but also be considered a competitive sport the way bodybuilding is. The (extensive) research paper claims that “a fat body is a legitimately built body.”
As you may have guessed by now, these papers are a hoax. Portland State University assistant professor of philosophy Peter Boghossian and mathematician James Lindsay, teamed up with Helen Pluckrose, the editor-in-chief of the current affairs magazine, Areo, in order to submit fake research to various journals and universities, in order to demonstrate that regressive liberalism was killing science, and academia was no longer based on facts and reality.
Not only all the research papers in this article were published and peer-reviewed with flying praises, but as of the date of this article, only one paper has been withdrawn by the publisher and the “scientific” and “research” community (See Retracted article: Human reactions to rape culture and queer performativity at urban dog parks in Portland, Oregon).